{"links":{"self":"https://petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions.json?page=324&parliament=3&state=published","first":"https://petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions.json?parliament=3&state=published","last":"https://petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions.json?page=327&parliament=3&state=published","next":"https://petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions.json?page=325&parliament=3&state=published","prev":"https://petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions.json?page=323&parliament=3&state=published"},"data":[{"type":"archived-petition","id":213796,"links":{"self":"https://petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions/213796.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2017-2019","government":"Conservative","dissolution_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:00.000+00:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Allow IVF medication to be donated or sold through appropriate channels.","background":"IVF medication is extremely expensive and is very often left over in large quantities due to miscalculation or like in my case because the treatment didn’t work. I have £800 worth of perfectly good medication (non-refrigerated) and my only option is, incredibly, to DISPOSE OF IT.","additional_details":"I contacted charities and IVF support groups and found that it’s actually illegal under the Medicines Act and the Drug trafficking Act to give them to someone else. \r\n\r\nIVF clinics or infertility charities should be allowed to redistribute the medication, helping families that cannot afford the drugs.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":7,"created_at":"2018-02-25T19:29:27.331Z","updated_at":"2018-10-23T23:00:04.247Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2018-04-23T12:57:46.521Z","closed_at":"2018-10-23T22:59:59.999Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2018-04-15T21:47:30.655Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_on":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":231726,"links":{"self":"https://petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions/231726.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2017-2019","government":"Conservative","dissolution_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:00.000+00:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Simplify planning use classes by combine A1, A2, B1 and D1.","background":"Planning requires change of use, which is expensive.  This is just red-tape.  Many categories overlaps.","additional_details":"https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planning_use_classes_in_England","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":7,"created_at":"2018-11-02T18:28:27.560Z","updated_at":"2019-05-15T23:00:02.414Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2018-11-15T16:16:28.782Z","closed_at":"2019-05-15T22:59:59.999Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2018-11-08T15:31:34.636Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_on":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":218999,"links":{"self":"https://petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions/218999.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2017-2019","government":"Conservative","dissolution_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:00.000+00:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Safeguard public funds with full annual NAO risk audit on all outsourcers","background":"The Government should change the law so that the NAO is given responsibly for auditing any company that wins Government contract worth more than £20 million and that any appropriate contract must include an agreement to be audited by the NAO and the results made public.","additional_details":"As illustrated by Carillion and numerous other major corporate failures before it, the ‘Big Four’ independent audit opinion has been confirmed as inherently flawed.  There is an inherent risk in the ‘Big Four’ conducting annual audits of companies where senior management are ex-‘Big Four’ themselves.  A mutual understanding serves each party in this situation as well as the knowledge that any moral hazard contracts or companies are ultimately backed by the government and UK taxpayers.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":7,"created_at":"2018-04-30T11:03:51.025Z","updated_at":"2020-02-26T22:38:53.359Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2018-05-04T12:06:41.996Z","closed_at":"2018-11-04T23:59:59.999Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2018-04-30T11:34:26.884Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_on":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":212070,"links":{"self":"https://petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions/212070.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2017-2019","government":"Conservative","dissolution_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:00.000+00:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Ban robotic trading of stocks, shares or financial derivatives","background":"Robotic/algorithmic trading  of stocks, shares and financial derivatives are used by big corporates to steal money from retail investors.","additional_details":"Big banks and institutions should not be allowed do use automatic trading which could cause flash crash in the markets eventually stealing money from weak hands of retail investors. Such trading should be banned. Markets would be less volatile and retail investors feel more secured to invest in such a situation.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":7,"created_at":"2018-02-06T22:34:48.900Z","updated_at":"2020-02-26T22:36:46.714Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2018-02-13T11:45:00.081Z","closed_at":"2018-08-13T22:59:59.999Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2018-02-07T10:23:05.403Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_on":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":274351,"links":{"self":"https://petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions/274351.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2017-2019","government":"Conservative","dissolution_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:00.000+00:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Create more hereditary titles as a greater honour than a knighthood.","background":"Hereditary titles are an important part of our culture which we are at risk of losing. It would be valuable to create new hereditary titles (eg. Earls) in the same way we have Knighthoods as an honour given to people who have done outstanding work in the arts, charities, health & social care, etc.","additional_details":"Originally, dukes were only ever the children or relatives of the monarch. Thus the sons of the monarch were Duke of Cornwall, Duke of York, etc. As time went on & the country evolved the titles stopped being tethered to duchies but were still awarded as marks of prestige to others who had served the country. It's gone back to just the royals! Ministers should advise the Monarch to create new hereditary honours to reward the work of ordinary people.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":7,"created_at":"2019-09-16T20:02:42.868Z","updated_at":"2020-02-26T22:54:25.082Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2019-09-24T11:25:33.559Z","closed_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:00.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2019-09-16T20:26:52.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_on":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":270042,"links":{"self":"https://petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions/270042.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2017-2019","government":"Conservative","dissolution_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:00.000+00:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Provide option to 'opt out' of the state pension and pay less NI contributions","background":"With the continuation of the state pension age increasing, younger citizens are, and will continue to be unfairly paying more contributions with less end benefit than previous generations, meaning many may not even receive the state pension after contributing all their working life.","additional_details":"With the national average life expectancy for being around 81 years old, future pensioners, will be working longer, contributing more and recieving less at the end, if they live long enough. Given that the state pension age continues to increase and there is no longer an increase in the average life expectancy an option to opt out and pay less NI should be available to allow citizens to pay more private pension contributions through out their working life to potentially retire earlier.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":7,"created_at":"2019-08-17T22:42:44.227Z","updated_at":"2020-02-26T22:53:18.748Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2019-09-02T15:32:56.654Z","closed_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:00.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2019-08-20T19:19:32.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_on":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":266118,"links":{"self":"https://petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions/266118.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2017-2019","government":"Conservative","dissolution_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:00.000+00:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Have a Maximum Temperature for school","background":"In my school everyone is moaning because of the warm weather and I just want to help the people get off of school if it is too warm because one of my close friends had heatstroke from the major amount of heat in 2018","additional_details":"I think the max temperature should be 27 degrees celcius","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":7,"created_at":"2019-06-26T13:13:45.537Z","updated_at":"2020-02-26T22:52:14.436Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2019-07-22T14:29:45.146Z","closed_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:00.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2019-06-26T13:32:02.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_on":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":273096,"links":{"self":"https://petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions/273096.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2017-2019","government":"Conservative","dissolution_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:00.000+00:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Brexit resolution: tailored second referendum","background":"As an answer to the Brexit situation which is currently showing no signs of being solved satisfactorily by anyone's standards, I propose that Boris Johnson is given until 4 October to agree an improved deal with the EU before a final referendum takes place, in time for Britain to leave this month.","additional_details":"The referendum would include the following options:\r\n\r\n1. Leave: No Deal\r\n2. Leave: Deal\r\n3. Remain\r\n\r\nIf options 1 and 2 combined achieve over 50%, then the higher of these will prevail. If Remain achieves over 50% then Britain will remain in the EU.\r\n\r\nBefore the referendum, Boris's final deal must be made public so that voters can make an informed decision on their future, something that they were prevented from doing on 23 June 2016 due to false and wishful campaigns from both camps.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":7,"created_at":"2019-09-06T19:34:40.309Z","updated_at":"2020-02-26T22:54:06.977Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2019-09-13T14:31:34.537Z","closed_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:00.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2019-09-08T07:22:02.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_on":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":217027,"links":{"self":"https://petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions/217027.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2017-2019","government":"Conservative","dissolution_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:00.000+00:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Add 1p Income Tax & Reduce Aid to OECD average to create a BREXIT readiness fund","background":"I believe the majority of British People support Foreign Aid spending but feel we are spending a bit too much currently. I also believe our Country is in need of Strategic Infrastructure and Business Support Spending to help us during the pre Brexit and immediate post Brexit period.","additional_details":"","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":7,"created_at":"2018-04-06T12:13:08.873Z","updated_at":"2020-02-26T22:38:14.530Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2018-04-12T14:48:26.172Z","closed_at":"2018-10-12T22:59:59.999Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2018-04-06T13:02:57.705Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_on":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":273525,"links":{"self":"https://petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions/273525.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2017-2019","government":"Conservative","dissolution_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:00.000+00:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Over 50% of the Electorate Must Vote in Favour, to Change UK Constitution.","background":"Parliamentary and Public issues caused by results of 2016 EU and 2014 Scottish Independence Referendums would be avoided and our democracy revived, if Constitutional Change could only be Implemented when over 50% of the Electorate votes for it in any Referendum.","additional_details":"The 2014 Scottish Independence Referendum saw a turnout of 84%, of which 45% voted Yes. With my proposal, this equates to less than 38% and a far more decisive Result. Import this format to the 2016 EU Referendum and I believe a more clear cut result would have been announced, sparing us the unsavoury scenes we've witnessed from our parliamentarians in the last 3years. The current farce we see now, would not be happening and faith in our Democracy would be restored.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":7,"created_at":"2019-09-09T18:07:36.000Z","updated_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:21.558Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2019-09-17T15:14:00.004Z","closed_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:00.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2019-09-11T18:28:42.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_on":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":263752,"links":{"self":"https://petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions/263752.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2017-2019","government":"Conservative","dissolution_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:00.000+00:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Have courses that have been self funded not count towards student finance","background":"Student finance counts self funded courses towards how they calculate your eligible for student finance, this is ridiculous as you are not using their service and because of this you are actively penalised for funding your own education, preventing students from getting the funding they need","additional_details":"Everyone is eligible for 4 years of funding from student finance to help cover the cost of higher education however they will count the years of study of self funded courses towards a students eligibility to use student finance this in turn means that students may not be able to get the funding they need to go to university, surely self funding a course should be encouraged not penalised as it seems extremely unfair for a course to be counted when the student didn't use student finance","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":7,"created_at":"2019-06-06T16:28:48.791Z","updated_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:14.072Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2019-07-24T15:47:45.697Z","closed_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:00.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2019-07-04T21:49:52.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_on":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":250271,"links":{"self":"https://petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions/250271.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2017-2019","government":"Conservative","dissolution_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:00.000+00:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Set restrictions on how much convicted drivers are penalised with car insurance","background":"When trying to buy car insurance after having convictions such as in10 drivers, especially young struggle to find an insurer that will even touch you and when you do it will be thousands of pounds...accepting your punishment at court shouldn’t mean that it should effect you for the next 10 years","additional_details":"","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":7,"created_at":"2019-03-24T12:59:06.837Z","updated_at":"2020-02-26T22:47:49.940Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2019-04-02T07:58:00.848Z","closed_at":"2019-10-02T22:59:59.999Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2019-03-26T01:44:45.399Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_on":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":277584,"links":{"self":"https://petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions/277584.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2017-2019","government":"Conservative","dissolution_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:00.000+00:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Scrap early termination fees that can cause hardship & possible harm","background":"Services who enter you into lengthy contracts like broadband providers, should be blocked from being able to dish out predatory early termination fees if:\r\n","additional_details":"- The house you move to (under certain circumstances) doesn't support the service\r\n- The fees cause hardship\r\n- The fees could cause other significant harm\r\n\r\nPredatory early termination fees only benefit the bottom lines of providers who dish them out, but in many cases cause hardship and unnecessary risk.\r\n \r\nFor example, a domestic abuse victim who has to vacate their property would still have to pay the early termination fees if their new property couldn't support the service.\r\n \r\nFamilies who separate and have to vacate quickly and often into cheaper properties where the service isn't available are discriminated into paying the termination fee.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":7,"created_at":"2019-10-18T13:47:06.224Z","updated_at":"2020-02-26T22:55:12.276Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2019-10-21T16:17:22.821Z","closed_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:00.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2019-10-18T15:05:42.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_on":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":207353,"links":{"self":"https://petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions/207353.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2017-2019","government":"Conservative","dissolution_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:00.000+00:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Demonstrate how more disabled people in the workforce has impacted productivity.","background":"On the 6/12/17, whilst giving evidence to the commons Treasury Select committee, Phillip Hammond stated that \"It is almost certainly the case that...very high levels of engagement in the workforce, for example of disabled people...may have had an impact on overall productivity measurements.","additional_details":"For a full transcript, follow the link\r\n\r\nhttp://data.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/committeeevidence.svc/evidencedocument/treasury-committee/budget-autumn-2017/oral/75188.html","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":7,"created_at":"2017-12-08T16:37:37.539Z","updated_at":"2018-06-12T23:00:04.673Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2017-12-12T15:56:53.069Z","closed_at":"2018-06-12T22:59:59.999Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2017-12-09T07:21:24.406Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_on":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":263081,"links":{"self":"https://petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions/263081.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2017-2019","government":"Conservative","dissolution_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:00.000+00:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Regulate pop-up tourist accommodation\r\n \r\n","background":"Visit England's accommodation standards are undermined by pop up unregulated providers. Business of approved and certificated self catering & serviced units is being depleted leading to official units potentially closing eg my own! V E is threatened. Risk to customers and neighbours can result.","additional_details":"In my area Dursley council, Glos.is aware of about 26 transient B&B's, some in attics!!! with very poor access. These are obvious from the photos posted on a Dursley website. \r\nMy own official Foresters B&B,Cam, Glos and another local one, Waterend Farm have had their business seriously affected because of the under the radar competition. Suitable fire systems & parking, food hygiene regs, proper insurance will not be guaranteed to their customers. V E confirm smaller member units have decreased.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":7,"created_at":"2019-05-30T14:02:46.043Z","updated_at":"2020-02-26T22:51:24.893Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2019-07-10T16:33:23.987Z","closed_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:00.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2019-05-31T14:43:02.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_on":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":273527,"links":{"self":"https://petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions/273527.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2017-2019","government":"Conservative","dissolution_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:00.000+00:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Increase the bursary for intial teacher training in Religious Education","background":"A bursary is a payment received by training teachers. This is available for many subjects, some subjects receive £26,000 for an academic year.\r\nHowever, RE only receives £9,000. This doesn't do justice to the subject because of how complex and difficult the subject is to teach.","additional_details":"RE is a subject which doesn't have a set curriculum, each school across the country is teaching something different. This requires RE teachers to have an enhanced subject knowledge. It's a subject of sensitivity which requires careful thought to phrasing and explaining of content unlike some subjects which just state the fact. Religion is complex and teaching it is not an easy task and it's such an important subject as religion shapes our society. Check out Gov page for funding in ITT 2019-2020.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":7,"created_at":"2019-09-09T18:13:18.382Z","updated_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:21.571Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2019-09-16T11:36:23.006Z","closed_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:00.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2019-09-09T20:50:42.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_on":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":261733,"links":{"self":"https://petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions/261733.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2017-2019","government":"Conservative","dissolution_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:00.000+00:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"STOP Tier 2 work Visa's being approved.","background":"The govt are approving Tier 2 visa's for those IT Skilled, Finance, Doctors etc. There is already a job shortage here, in those sectors and others. We have enough people born here with those skills.","additional_details":"People are getting Indefinate Leave to Remain (permanent stay) and then bringing their families over, this puts additional pressure on school places, the NHS, other public services and jobs. This is unfair, people born here should be given priority. The govt have made it too easy for companies to be able to get work visa's for their employees.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":7,"created_at":"2019-05-17T20:44:38.334Z","updated_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:12.453Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2019-06-24T16:51:56.938Z","closed_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:00.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2019-05-26T00:01:12.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_on":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":274876,"links":{"self":"https://petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions/274876.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2017-2019","government":"Conservative","dissolution_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:00.000+00:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Compulsory for vehicles on roads to have their dipped headlights on at all times","background":"The amount of vehicles on the roads with no lights on during inclement weather and when it's getting dark etc. are almost invisible. It should be made compulsory for vehicles on the roads to have them on at all times.  It works in Norway and Sweden and quite a few other countries. See and be seen.","additional_details":"","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":7,"created_at":"2019-09-23T13:13:52.497Z","updated_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:22.509Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2019-09-30T10:11:40.966Z","closed_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:00.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2019-09-23T16:00:42.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_on":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":274875,"links":{"self":"https://petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions/274875.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2017-2019","government":"Conservative","dissolution_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:00.000+00:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Break the Brexit deadlock through a two-question referendum.","background":"Q1. Should the UK remain a member of the European Union or leave the EU?\r\n\r\nQ2. If you have answered 'Leave' to Question 1, should the UK leave the EU with a deal or with no-deal?\r\n\r\nThe 'deal' would need to be defined. If a majority vote for 'leave' in Q1, Q2 defines the way the UK leaves the EU.","additional_details":"My proposed two-question solution would provide:\r\n- clarity on what 'leave' means to the public\r\n- the ability to vote on leaving or remaining in the EU now knowing this information\r\n- the ability to define the method for leaving should it still be the nations preferred option upon knowing this information\r\n\r\nThe following questions do not represent the Leave and Remain sides of the debate properly:\r\n- remain vs. a proposed deal\r\n- remain vs. a proposed deal vs. no-deal\r\n- a proposed deal vs. no deal","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":7,"created_at":"2019-09-23T13:05:41.694Z","updated_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:22.501Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2019-09-30T16:27:39.227Z","closed_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:00.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2019-09-25T06:03:02.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_on":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":264090,"links":{"self":"https://petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions/264090.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2017-2019","government":"Conservative","dissolution_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:00.000+00:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Remove time constraints for A-Level examinations.","background":"Current A-Level examinations have unrealistic expectations with regard to pupils performing to their best ability as a result of the time constraints placed on public examinations. The need to work at such speed is not applicable to working life and furthermore is not a true marker of intelligence.","additional_details":"","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":7,"created_at":"2019-06-09T18:56:47.721Z","updated_at":"2020-02-26T22:51:41.096Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2019-07-09T15:18:45.713Z","closed_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:00.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2019-06-10T10:14:32.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_on":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":274757,"links":{"self":"https://petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions/274757.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2017-2019","government":"Conservative","dissolution_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:00.000+00:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Ban of toy replica guns in the UK","background":"I have made a short video on Gun Crime and I believe that buying children toy guns normalises the use of guns and makes them fun.  Guns are not fun and children should not grow up thinking they are.  If we ban guns from stores it sends out a clear message!","additional_details":"","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":7,"created_at":"2019-09-21T19:24:49.215Z","updated_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:22.364Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2019-09-27T10:10:24.140Z","closed_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:00.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2019-09-21T22:38:22.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_on":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":274656,"links":{"self":"https://petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions/274656.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2017-2019","government":"Conservative","dissolution_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:00.000+00:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"2 referendums on Brexit, No Deal vs deal in 2019, Rejoin vs stay out in 2036","background":"The referendum option is primarily pushed by those who want to over-turn the result, we could have one on the Leave options, being No Deal vs any new deal negotiated by Boris Johnson or Theresa May's deal.\r\n","additional_details":"The 2016 referendum answered the question for a generation, lets book the date now 20 years after the first to decide whether to rejoin.\r\nThere are no good options left, no option that won't anger one side. We cannot continue. It is democratic to be able to change our minds, but it can't be done until after we actually leave, and Politicians need to restore trust that the 2016 vote is respected. Giving an option to get back in, in a generations time, is fair. It is also a compromise between both sides, the UK would be less likely to diverge too much, the EU would want to work in a way that encourage us to rejoin.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":7,"created_at":"2019-09-20T11:45:35.935Z","updated_at":"2020-02-26T22:54:29.794Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2019-09-30T16:32:38.418Z","closed_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:00.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2019-09-22T19:20:42.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_on":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":261891,"links":{"self":"https://petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions/261891.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2017-2019","government":"Conservative","dissolution_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:00.000+00:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Government to set up a new free single tribunal body to replace ineffective ICO","background":"The Information Commission is failing and we need a new free single tribunal body with more powers and a legal duty to obtain all records/evidence in all complaints and the ability to fine across organisations/public bodies if they fail to comply or abuse/breach data law & withhold records.\r\n","additional_details":"I believe the ICO is failing due to the conflict of interests as it is funded by fees from the organisations it is supposed to monitor/investigate. Many people are being left frustrated as under the ICO they still cannot gain access to their records or have their information/data corrected. This failure is enabling organisations/public bodies to conceal their failure/abuse. The government must protect the general public and introduce a new tribunal to hold those who fail to account.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":7,"created_at":"2019-05-19T12:05:53.891Z","updated_at":"2020-02-26T22:51:06.263Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2019-06-20T16:47:24.413Z","closed_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:00.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2019-05-20T18:16:12.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_on":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":268344,"links":{"self":"https://petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions/268344.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2017-2019","government":"Conservative","dissolution_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:00.000+00:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Recommend all of Greater London for ‘city status’ through royal charter","background":"City status in the United Kingdom is granted by the monarch, and there are currently 69 cities in the UK - London is not one of them. Both the City of London (Square Mile) and the City of Westminster are classed as cities but London as a whole does not have city status","additional_details":"As the UK’s capital, all of London (Greater London) should have city status","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":7,"created_at":"2019-07-26T07:45:02.697Z","updated_at":"2020-02-26T22:52:50.445Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2019-08-30T16:53:55.543Z","closed_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:00.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2019-07-27T17:34:22.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_on":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":276919,"links":{"self":"https://petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions/276919.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2017-2019","government":"Conservative","dissolution_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:00.000+00:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Do not ban eating on public transport.","background":"The outgoing Chief medical officer, Dame Sally Davies, has proposed banning eating on public transport to tackle child obesity. Imagine not being able to eat on a 5-hour train journey. Parents are responsible for their child's welfare, and the state has no right to interfere.","additional_details":"","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":7,"created_at":"2019-10-10T18:08:58.753Z","updated_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:23.888Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2019-10-14T12:54:02.438Z","closed_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:00.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2019-10-12T14:17:52.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_on":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}}]}