{"links":{"self":"https://petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions.json?page=41&parliament=3","first":"https://petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions.json?parliament=3","last":"https://petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions.json?page=1124&parliament=3","next":"https://petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions.json?page=42&parliament=3","prev":"https://petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions.json?page=40&parliament=3"},"data":[{"type":"archived-petition","id":278254,"links":{"self":"https://petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions/278254.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2017-2019","government":"Conservative","dissolution_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:00.000+00:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Ban plastic cutlery and straws in schools ","background":"The Batt School Council wants schools in the UK to stop using plastic cutlery. The children are already making progress in our school and as part of Parliament Week decided to start an e-petition calling for all schools to stop using plastic cutlery and straws.","additional_details":"","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":1931,"created_at":"2019-10-24T06:46:17.536Z","updated_at":"2020-02-26T22:55:21.481Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2019-10-25T16:44:38.289Z","closed_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:00.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2019-10-24T11:20:02.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_on":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":236815,"links":{"self":"https://petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions/236815.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2017-2019","government":"Conservative","dissolution_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:00.000+00:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Lift the ban on .22 handguns.","background":"I believe the original ban on handguns in the UK in the 1990s was undemocratic and disproportionate, then Tony Blair's government went further to ban .22 handguns for no good justifiable reason at all. I believe ownership of these firearms is not a concern for public safety, nor was it ever. ","additional_details":"We respectfully ask that these firearms be legalized again for personal ownership and sporting purposes.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":1929,"created_at":"2019-01-09T08:32:33.157Z","updated_at":"2020-02-26T22:44:01.799Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2019-01-16T11:43:12.216Z","closed_at":"2019-07-16T22:59:59.999Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2019-01-09T08:41:30.758Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_on":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":232721,"links":{"self":"https://petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions/232721.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2017-2019","government":"Conservative","dissolution_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:00.000+00:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"British Sign Language Should be taught in Primary and Secondary schools in UK.","background":"Children who are deaf should have the choice of which school they want to go to, but the problem with this is integrating with other children cause BSL (British Sign Language) is not part of the National Curriculum.","additional_details":"Approximately 1 in every 1000 children is born with a severe or profound hearing loss. 90% of all deaf children are born to hearing parents. Approximately 50,000 deaf people in the UK use British Sign Language (BSL) as their first or preferred language.\r\n\r\nDeaf children in the UK aged 0 to 15 is at 23000 so it shows that BSL should be in the National Curriculum so our children can integrate with the deaf community and BSL would be a language they would use lots off time in there life.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":1928,"created_at":"2018-11-12T19:19:25.545Z","updated_at":"2020-02-26T22:42:50.160Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2018-11-19T15:36:47.374Z","closed_at":"2019-05-19T22:59:59.999Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2018-11-13T06:01:47.011Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_on":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":203543,"links":{"self":"https://petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions/203543.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2017-2019","government":"Conservative","dissolution_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:00.000+00:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Halt the cuts to the Metropolitan Police budget","background":"Having lost £600 million in real terms over the past 7 years, the Metropolitan Police face a further £400 million cut over the next 4 years.\r\n\r\n70 per cent of all police spending in London comes from the Home Office, meaning that any change in that funding has a disproportionate effect.","additional_details":"","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":1926,"created_at":"2017-10-23T08:40:27.120Z","updated_at":"2020-02-26T22:34:08.870Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2017-10-27T17:30:55.442Z","closed_at":"2018-04-27T22:59:59.999Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2017-10-23T09:01:58.401Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_on":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":208507,"links":{"self":"https://petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions/208507.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2017-2019","government":"Conservative","dissolution_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:00.000+00:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Do extra checks in scans during pregnancy to check for vasa previa placentas.","background":"Vasa previa placentas are rare 1:2500 pregnant women have them therefore they do not check for them as standard however detected before labour mum and baby have 99% chance of survival. Undetected if mum goes into labour baby's chance of NOT surviving is between 55-95%.","additional_details":"This is when the vessels that feed the baby oxygen are on the outside of the placenta so when mum dilates and baby's head moves down the vessels burst starving baby of oxygen (with 2mins to get baby out) and causing mum to haemorrhage. Detected, mum will be hospitalised from 29 weeks and have a c section between 35-36 weeks. Undetected results can be devastating. A few extra minutes on a scan could save mum and baby's life.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":1920,"created_at":"2017-12-29T02:18:14.314Z","updated_at":"2018-07-05T07:54:49.825Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2018-01-04T10:10:10.093Z","closed_at":"2018-07-04T22:59:59.999Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2017-12-30T10:06:50.224Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_on":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":274868,"links":{"self":"https://petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions/274868.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2017-2019","government":"Conservative","dissolution_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:00.000+00:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Commercialise the U.K. Tidal Stream Industry with Government Revenue Support.","background":"We call for the UK Government to support our Tidal Energy industry with an equitable revenue support deal that will deliver a plentiful supply of low cost, predictable green energy and give the UK world leading expertise and technology it can export around the globe.","additional_details":"The UK has 50% of Europe's tidal energy resource but the industry needs financial and policy support to deliver the innovations and scale to continue to reduce costs and allow it to compete in the energy market.\r\n \r\nWith the right support, tidal energy can play a key role in delivering the UK’s net-zero emissions target and creating jobs within UK industry.\r\n\r\nThe UK is in danger of losing the initiative just at a time when the demand to build world leading industries and expertise is needed most.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":1919,"created_at":"2019-09-23T11:05:19.027Z","updated_at":"2020-02-26T22:54:33.740Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2019-09-26T15:33:08.187Z","closed_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:00.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2019-09-23T12:58:22.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_on":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":214766,"links":{"self":"https://petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions/214766.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2017-2019","government":"Conservative","dissolution_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:00.000+00:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Save our pets from death on the roads Don't Ban Containment Systems","background":"The Government has started a consultation on banning electronic training aids for cats and dogs. It is vital that containment systems do not get caught up in any ban. These systems save the lives of thousands of cats and dogs each year. Over 250,000 cats & countless dogs are run over on our roads.","additional_details":"In 2007 DEFRA commissioned a study into the use of Electronic Pulse Training Aids. This study specifically excluded containment fences. The highly regarded Companion Animal Welfare Council's in-depth study of June 2012 concluded that it was not possible to formulate an evidence-based argument against the use of Electric Pulse Training Aids (EPTAs). In 2016 research from Lincoln University into cat containment \"No evidence of long-term welfare problems with electronic containment of cats\"","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":1919,"created_at":"2018-03-11T10:19:20.635Z","updated_at":"2018-09-16T23:00:05.304Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2018-03-16T09:55:45.758Z","closed_at":"2018-09-16T22:59:59.999Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2018-03-11T10:52:30.906Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_on":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":229565,"links":{"self":"https://petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions/229565.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2017-2019","government":"Conservative","dissolution_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:00.000+00:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Create a 26 week scan during pregnancy to reduce the risk of still births.","background":"In 2016 There were 3,430 stillbirths throughout the year in the UK. still births are when the baby dies after 20 weeks. Could this figure be reduced if there was to be an extra scan that takes place at 26 weeks during pregnancy. In 2016 there were 9 stillbirths a day. That is 9 too many.","additional_details":"","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":1918,"created_at":"2018-09-30T10:02:15.404Z","updated_at":"2019-04-05T23:00:00.172Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2018-10-05T11:42:01.839Z","closed_at":"2019-04-05T22:59:59.999Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2018-09-30T13:37:42.124Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_on":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":233799,"links":{"self":"https://petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions/233799.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2017-2019","government":"Conservative","dissolution_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:00.000+00:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Add the blood test for 22q to the Guthrie test 'heel prick' newborn screening.","background":"My daughter has 22q11.2, she's historically been failed by clinicians, educational practitioners/institutions, social care and society in the wider context. Despite my concerns, late diagnosis at 4y6m, has impacted on her self esteem, language, social, emotional, mental health and life chances.","additional_details":"Max Appeal is the UK charity that supports those affected. According to the All-Party Parliamentary Group, 22q11 could be the most common genetic disorder. 1 in 500 of the population has been reported, this would be 2x Down Syndrome, 6x Cystic Fibrosis. They found Mental health difficulties affect 93% of people with 22q11and it's the single most common cause of schizophrenia which affects 25% of people with 22q11. Delays in diagnosis has an adverse affect on the child, their family and it's also a hidden cost for the NHS, social services and welfare state.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":1916,"created_at":"2018-11-24T18:50:30.758Z","updated_at":"2020-02-26T22:43:09.813Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2018-12-04T14:04:46.684Z","closed_at":"2019-06-04T22:59:59.999Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2018-11-24T19:03:33.306Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_on":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":269554,"links":{"self":"https://petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions/269554.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2017-2019","government":"Conservative","dissolution_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:00.000+00:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Ban the use of virgin plastic packaging on non-food products","background":"A lot of focus to reduce plastic packaging has been put on food products but it will be difficult to make real progress in counteracting this catastrophe quickly enough while keeping food safe. Let's start with non-food products, also to ensure demand for recycled plastics to keep recycling viable.","additional_details":"Recycled plastics is not yet viable for food, so food brands will continue to flood our waste system with virgin plastics.\r\nGov and consumers need to engage manufacturers and packers of non-edible/sterile products. Virgin plastic packaging on such products should be outlawed, as there is no reason for it. eg. Magazines, cards, notebooks, razors, toys, hardware, tools, stationery, candles, toilet paper, pocket tissues, electronics & gadgets (chargers, earphones, cables), homeware, guitar strings","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":1914,"created_at":"2019-08-11T15:56:57.317Z","updated_at":"2020-02-26T22:53:11.370Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2019-08-21T12:54:00.958Z","closed_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:00.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2019-08-11T16:40:12.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_on":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":233690,"links":{"self":"https://petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions/233690.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2017-2019","government":"Conservative","dissolution_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:00.000+00:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Routine PSA screening for men over 50 on NHS to check for prostate cancer.","background":"Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in men in the UK.\r\nThis simple blood test that I am petitioning for could save thousands if not millions of life’s. Unfortunately it was found to late in my Grandfather. And I want to change this.","additional_details":"This simple blood test is not routinely offered on the NHS, and I want change to this as it could save millions of life’s just through one blood test. Men over the age of 50 are at most risk so by routinely having a PSA test, could again, save millions.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":1914,"created_at":"2018-11-22T22:13:29.264Z","updated_at":"2020-02-26T22:43:07.993Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2018-12-03T14:55:59.274Z","closed_at":"2019-06-03T22:59:59.999Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2018-11-22T22:39:24.689Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_on":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":215721,"links":{"self":"https://petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions/215721.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2017-2019","government":"Conservative","dissolution_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:00.000+00:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Give a mandatory lifetime driving ban for causing death by dangerous driving","background":"Nick Farrimond (35) was killed on the 29th August 2016 by a driver who was convicted and imprisoned for causing death by dangerous driving. He was under the influence of drugs and alcohol. He was also given a ten year driving ban which means he can drive again and could go out and do it again","additional_details":"","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":1911,"created_at":"2018-03-20T21:26:13.138Z","updated_at":"2020-02-26T22:37:50.150Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2018-03-28T13:54:01.532Z","closed_at":"2018-09-28T22:59:59.999Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2018-03-21T08:06:48.621Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_on":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":227603,"links":{"self":"https://petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions/227603.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2017-2019","government":"Conservative","dissolution_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:00.000+00:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"End dog on dog attacks","background":"Currently there is no law to protect our dogs which is enforced, when a dog attacks or kills another dog. \r\nThe government need to update the dangerous dogs act 1991 and make the owners liable for prosecution if an attack happens.","additional_details":"On the 19th August 2018 our blind 14yr old toy poodle was savagely attacked by two American bulldogs. She was playing in the long grass when the two dogs saw movement and hunted her. The dogs were too strong and she couldn’t be saved. \r\nWe need to fight to save all other dogs lives from dangerous dogs which are not correctly restrained. \r\nWe can’t bring Emma or the other dogs who have lost their lives back but we can try and change the future. \r\n#EmmasLaw","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":1911,"created_at":"2018-08-20T18:10:00.149Z","updated_at":"2019-03-05T00:00:06.443Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2018-09-04T13:04:17.720Z","closed_at":"2019-03-04T23:59:59.999Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2018-08-20T19:47:22.330Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_on":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":229636,"links":{"self":"https://petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions/229636.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2017-2019","government":"Conservative","dissolution_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:00.000+00:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Commons to vote on the question \"Brexit is in the UK's best interest\"","background":"Despite the importance of this topic, there has never been a debate in the House of Commons specifically on this question. Parliament's first duty is to always act in what it considers to be the UK's best interest. Hence, that consideration needs to be made and should dictate action.","additional_details":"Commons Briefing Paper 07212 of June 2016, regarding the EU Referendum, makes clear the status that the referendum result would have. Despite this, the result has been taken as a mandate for action. Parliament represents all UK citizens, whether they can and do vote or not, and should not facilitate a vote by c.26% of us as 'the will of the people' but act in what it judges the best interests of the UK and all its people. That judgement must be established.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":1909,"created_at":"2018-10-01T20:07:10.654Z","updated_at":"2020-02-26T22:41:55.157Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2018-10-15T10:33:33.357Z","closed_at":"2019-04-15T22:59:59.999Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2018-10-02T04:50:50.947Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_on":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":200099,"links":{"self":"https://petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions/200099.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2017-2019","government":"Conservative","dissolution_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:00.000+00:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Require HMRC to separate out the cost of Brexit on personal tax statements.","background":"The UK Government is taking us out of the EU whatever the cost. During the referendum campaign, much was made of the cost of membership of the EU. There will be costs to leave the EU - public sector time, research and consultancy fees, legal costs, repayments, and so on. These should be identified.","additional_details":"The 'Vote Leave' campaign advertised a fee of £350m per week going to the EU (£18.2bn per year), while the ONS calculates the true value to be £9.9bn per year (http://visual.ons.gov.uk/uk-perspectives-2016-the-uk-contribution-to-the-eu-budget/). Brexit is predicted to cost an additional £60bn (https://www.ft.com/content/51a19263-9788-37b9-a9fa-8cd307265edf). This will have consequences for government spending and tax rates - taxpayers must be able to understand where their money is being used.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":1908,"created_at":"2017-09-12T21:44:47.947Z","updated_at":"2020-02-26T22:33:25.682Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2017-09-13T16:17:27.952Z","closed_at":"2018-03-13T23:59:59.999Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2017-09-13T12:31:38.344Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_on":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":251938,"links":{"self":"https://petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions/251938.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2017-2019","government":"Conservative","dissolution_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:00.000+00:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Do not adopt the new road safety rules proposed by the EU in 2022.","background":"The changes proposed by the EU modify the way a vehicle drives so drastically that I believe everyone would need to re-take a modernized driving test which of course nobody wants to do. Older people especially will struggle with technological changes and many people pay more to avoid a black box.","additional_details":"The EU have provisionally agreed new rules which are set to implement a speed limiting technology on to all vehicles sold after 2022. There are also plans to install a black box recorder in these vehicles to track location and speed. Regardless of the outcome of Brexit, the UK Department Of Transport has said that the UK will also implement these rules.\r\n\r\nIn 2016 the public voted to leave the EU because we do not want to be bound by it's rules any anymore.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":1907,"created_at":"2019-03-27T10:13:25.770Z","updated_at":"2019-10-08T23:00:06.453Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2019-04-08T11:53:48.107Z","closed_at":"2019-10-08T22:59:59.999Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2019-03-27T11:17:47.261Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_on":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":216461,"links":{"self":"https://petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions/216461.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2017-2019","government":"Conservative","dissolution_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:00.000+00:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Make it compulsory that new borns have a heart scan before leaving hospital","background":"Lots of new born babies are sent home from hospital with serious heart problems, which, are not known about until it’s too late. My youngest son was sent home with heart defects which were not picked up until he was two weeks old & required surgery almost immediately. This could’ve been prevented.","additional_details":"When we were in the specialist heart hospital, there were many children coming in, with a late diagnosis. This can be very fatal and stressful. We didn’t know anything about the heart so we had to learn about this too. Having a heart scan like an echo would detect any problems or issues. The faster it’s picked up, the better. Specialists can be involved straight away with the correct care needed. An echo will take 15 mins. I would rather spend 15 mins extra knowing my child’s heart was healthy.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":1892,"created_at":"2018-03-29T13:36:39.306Z","updated_at":"2020-02-26T22:38:05.027Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2018-04-17T10:43:36.745Z","closed_at":"2018-10-17T22:59:59.999Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2018-03-29T14:18:03.893Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_on":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":213630,"links":{"self":"https://petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions/213630.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2017-2019","government":"Conservative","dissolution_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:00.000+00:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Introduce sanctions to STOP anonymous, false & malicious complaints to Ofsted.","background":"For too long those in the education & care sector have been at the mercy of disgruntled employees and/or families who are able to make anonymous, malicious & false complaints to Ofsted. \nThe impact can be detrimental to the organisation involved & is costing the UK tax payer unnecessarily.","additional_details":"The impact on the organisation can be detrimental if the malicious complaint becomes public. Resulting in a tarnished reputation and/or closure of a service in come instances.\n\nWe are petitioning for Ofsted & the Government to introduce fines to those making false & malicious complaints. \nThis means no more anonymous complaints can be received. \n\nThis change will safeguard organisations, save money & help tighten up Ofsted's complaints procedures.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":1890,"created_at":"2018-02-23T14:00:54.487Z","updated_at":"2018-09-01T23:00:01.349Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2018-03-01T15:53:29.368Z","closed_at":"2018-09-01T22:59:59.999Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2018-02-23T14:16:51.872Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_on":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":242244,"links":{"self":"https://petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions/242244.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2017-2019","government":"Conservative","dissolution_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:00.000+00:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Use the most recent household growth projections when planning housing need.","background":"Housing need assessments should be objective. They should be based on accurate and up to date figures and not determined by political targets. The standard method for assessing local need should use the 2016-based ONS figures.","additional_details":"","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":1882,"created_at":"2019-02-18T18:01:07.299Z","updated_at":"2019-09-04T23:00:08.822Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2019-03-04T18:11:17.189Z","closed_at":"2019-09-04T22:59:59.999Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2019-02-19T21:32:41.204Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_on":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":200523,"links":{"self":"https://petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions/200523.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2017-2019","government":"Conservative","dissolution_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:00.000+00:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Put General Practitioners on the Home Office's 'Shortage Occupation List'","background":"GP Practices in rural areas struggle to recruit doctors, forcing many surgeries to close. There are many GPs from outside the EU who would like to work in the UK. However, Practices can't offer them a job without going though the visa bureaucracy, and the NHS is losing many good doctors as a result.","additional_details":"Lincolnshire patients are suffering due to the lack of GPs [1]. In Lincoln, surgeries are closing as a result [2]. The Home Office have been asked to put GPs on the 'shortage occupation' list, but have refused to do this. This is unacceptable.   \r\n[1] http://lincolnshirereporter.co.uk/2017/09/i-dont-bother-trying-anymore-man-with-heart-disease-says-queues-outside-gp-are-now-a-joke/\r\n[2] http://thelincolnite.co.uk/2017/09/lincoln-gp-surgery-close-merge-new-plans/","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":1881,"created_at":"2017-09-16T12:54:17.361Z","updated_at":"2020-02-26T22:33:33.349Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2017-09-19T13:39:42.018Z","closed_at":"2018-03-19T23:59:59.999Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2017-09-16T15:04:00.181Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_on":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":274100,"links":{"self":"https://petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions/274100.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2017-2019","government":"Conservative","dissolution_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:00.000+00:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Give UK citizens' family equal immigration rights to that of EU citizens' family","background":"EU citizens' family can settle after 5 years' continuous residence (no other requirement); the application is free.\r\nUK citizens' family have to meet additional requirements of visa type and financial means; the application is £2,389. They should be allowed to settle under the same conditions above.","additional_details":"Under the EU Settlement Scheme, EU citizens' family can settle after 5 years' continuous residence (no other requirement), and the application is free. In contrast, UK citizens' family can only settle after 5 years' continuous residence with a family visa, providing they meet certain financial thresholds (at least £18,600 a year), and the application costs £2,389.\r\nUK citizens' family should be treated equally, and allowed to settle after 5 years' continuous residence with no other requirement.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":1879,"created_at":"2019-09-13T23:09:47.798Z","updated_at":"2020-02-26T22:54:21.362Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2019-09-23T13:42:46.057Z","closed_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:00.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2019-09-14T19:22:22.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_on":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":205085,"links":{"self":"https://petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions/205085.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2017-2019","government":"Conservative","dissolution_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:00.000+00:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"The Scottish Government should be called the Scottish Executive.","background":"The description of Scotland's devolved administration as a 'Government' causes confusion about its constitutional remit, which has led to considerable over-reach by devolved bodies into reserved matters. This duplication is contentious, costly, and detracts from the good governance of Scotland.","additional_details":"We petition Parliament to repeal section 12 of the Scotland Act 2012.","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":1875,"created_at":"2017-11-12T20:56:29.499Z","updated_at":"2020-02-26T22:34:37.354Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2017-11-17T16:23:41.162Z","closed_at":"2018-05-17T22:59:59.999Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2017-11-13T00:41:36.867Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_on":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":232192,"links":{"self":"https://petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions/232192.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2017-2019","government":"Conservative","dissolution_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:00.000+00:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Probate Fees in England/Wales should remain a low flat fee covering admin costs.","background":"A present a flat fee of £215 applies. From April 2019: Up to £50K: no charge. \r\n\r\n£50K - £300K: £250. £300K - £500K: £750. £500K - £1m: £2,5K. The Min of Justice reckons 80% of estates won't pay more than £750. A rise of over £500! This is a stealth tax on death, not a fee to cover admin costs.","additional_details":"Probate fees should not help fund courts & tribunal systems. The proposed hike is unjustified. \r\n\r\nhttps://www.moneyobserver.com/news/probate-costs-could-hit-ps6000-banded-fees-confirmed\r\n\r\nhttps://www.telegraph.co.uk/tax/news/government-confirms-new-death-tax-will-see-estates-paying-3770pc/?li_source=LI&li_medium=li-recommendation-widget\r\n\r\nhttps://www.accountancydaily.co/probate-fees-rise-ps6k-largest-estates\r\n\r\nhttps://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/article-6356603/New-death-tax-hit-grieving-families.html","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":1859,"created_at":"2018-11-07T10:03:13.287Z","updated_at":"2019-05-14T23:00:06.676Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2018-11-14T10:41:01.752Z","closed_at":"2019-05-14T22:59:59.999Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2018-11-07T11:02:44.389Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_on":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":276313,"links":{"self":"https://petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions/276313.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2017-2019","government":"Conservative","dissolution_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:00.000+00:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Prevent planning permission from being granted at Askham Bog","background":"Property developers are continuing to target land adjacent to an ecologically important nature reserve in York which threatens to drain the bog and destroy its ecosystem. The council have refused permission yet an appeal is in progress to try and give the developers the answer they want.","additional_details":"The Secretary of State should ‘call in’ the planning decision and stop the development going ahead.\r\nPlanning applications can be intercepted and determined solely by the Secretary of State. This is an exceptional circumstance, not only because of the damage it will cause to the bog, it will also place more strain on local services, infrastructure and, dare I say it, ignores the democratic wishes of both the local citizens and David Attenborough. \r\nhttps://planningaccess.york.gov.uk/online-applications/appealDetails.do?keyVal=PWHBTBSJ07600&activeTab=summary \r\nhttps://www.ywt.org.uk/saveaskhambog","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":1859,"created_at":"2019-10-03T17:53:38.336Z","updated_at":"2020-02-26T22:54:53.796Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2019-10-08T15:31:25.891Z","closed_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:00.000Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2019-10-03T18:09:52.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_on":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}},{"type":"archived-petition","id":206476,"links":{"self":"https://petition.parliament.uk/archived/petitions/206476.json"},"parliament":{"period":"2017-2019","government":"Conservative","dissolution_at":"2019-11-06T00:01:00.000+00:00","response_threshold":10000,"debate_threshold":100000},"attributes":{"action":"Proscribe Britain First","background":"Britain First are an ultra far right group, they have a paramilitary wing called the \"Britain First Defence Force\". They organise ‘days of action’ that target a specific demographic namely Muslims, they use these days of actions to harass Muslims in shops, on the street or in mosques.","additional_details":"Some of its campaigners have also been banned from every mosque in England and Wales for their actions.\r\nhttp://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/britain-first-banned-from-all-mosques-in-england-and-wales-after-police-take-out-injunction-a7196831.html\r\n","committee_note":null,"state":"closed","signature_count":1857,"created_at":"2017-11-28T19:55:34.418Z","updated_at":"2020-02-26T22:35:03.475Z","rejected_at":null,"opened_at":"2017-12-13T16:12:28.839Z","closed_at":"2018-06-13T22:59:59.999Z","moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2017-11-29T08:47:07.188Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"debate_scheduled_on":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"rejection":null,"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}}]}