{"links":{"self":"https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/749894.json"},"data":{"type":"petition","id":749894,"attributes":{"action":"We dont think that pay per mile has legitimate aims of revenue only & oppose it","background":"We oppose the Chancellors Pay per  Mile on the basis that it violates the right to privacy article 8 of the Human Rights act 1998 & therefore we do not want it introduced. The only legitimate aim of taxation is £ & there.is no need to implement our personal tavel details & information Into revenue.","additional_details":"On Page 103 of the Blackstones guide to the Human Rights Act 1998 by John Wadham & Helen Mountfield\r\n\r\nIt states these criteria for the test of article 8: \r\n\r\n(a) that an interference corresponds to a pressing social need (Sunday Times v United Kingdom); \r\n\r\n(b) that it is proportionate to the legitimate aim pursued.\r\n\r\nThere is no social need for pay per mile, the existing system works fine.\r\nWe believe the government has ulterior motives in addition to taxation moving us towards a China Gov model","committee_note":null,"state":"rejected","signature_count":8,"created_at":"2025-11-07T20:44:41.204Z","updated_at":"2026-01-05T17:17:20.025Z","rejected_at":"2025-12-12T17:04:27.727Z","opened_at":null,"closed_at":null,"moderation_threshold_reached_at":"2025-11-08T15:56:00.000Z","response_threshold_reached_at":null,"government_response_at":null,"debate_threshold_reached_at":null,"scheduled_debate_date":null,"debate_outcome_at":null,"creator_name":null,"rejection":{"code":"duplicate","details":"Do not introduce pay-per-mile road charging for UK drivers: https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/749667"},"government_response":null,"debate":null,"departments":[],"topics":[]}}}