Rejected petition 2nd EU referendum as the changes a leave result would enact were not defined.

There should be a 2nd EU referendum as the public weren't given a full definition of what leave would mean. This has led to a result based on unclear claims made by both sides, and therefore we should have a revote once this has been defined and made clear to the public.

More details

Before this second referendum such claims like £350 million a week should be cleared up as I believe that the people who were under informed voted based of that number alone. Already the pound has plumited before slowly recovering and the price of gold has risen 7% this shows that people who are wealthy no longer trust the British Pound and are instead buying gold as it is a more stable currency currently, this is bad for the British economy if we have some of the wealthy leaving.

This petition was rejected

Why was this petition rejected?

There’s already a petition about this issue. We cannot accept a new petition when we already have one about a very similar issue.

You are more likely to get action on this issue if you sign and share a single petition.

https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/134618

We only reject petitions that don’t meet the petition standards.

Date submitted 25 June 2016
Get petition data (json format)

About petition data

The data shows the number of people who have signed the petition by country as well as in the constituency of each Member of Parliament. This data is available for all petitions on the site. It is not a list of people who have signed the petition. The only name that is shared on the site is that of the petition creator.