Rejected petition No Second Referendum, If Decision Was To Stay A Second One Wouldn't Be Allowed!

The U.K. Spoke, if the decision was to stay a second referendum would not have even been suggested
The decision is made, there has been three referendums in U.K. history, another one is not required
If there is another it will be assumed to not be correct as this one was awaited for months

More details

People had months to decide 'in' or 'out' there were no mistakes made, there were two boxes to choose from, it is absolutely ridiculous that a second vote is even being considered
A win is a win whether it be by 1% or 99% what if the next one isn't upto 60% do we just keep having them?!

This petition was rejected

Why was this petition rejected?

There’s already a petition about this issue. We cannot accept a new petition when we already have one about a very similar issue.

You are more likely to get action on this issue if you sign and share a single petition.

https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/134345

We only reject petitions that don’t meet the petition standards.

Date submitted 25 June 2016
Get petition data (json format)

About petition data

The data shows the number of people who have signed the petition by country as well as in the constituency of each Member of Parliament. This data is available for all petitions on the site. It is not a list of people who have signed the petition. The only name that is shared on the site is that of the petition creator.