Rejected petition Freedom of thought and action.

More details

It is alleged that the deputy prime minister is eligible to receive an EU pension, the terms of which require him to be supportive of the EU at all times. Is it constitutional that a member of parliament should be so restricted in his thoughts and subsequently, is his loyalty to the crown and people compromised? Should the house urgently debate whether a member of our parliament should be thus constrained in his freedom of thought and that if such constraint is found to exist, whether this is compatible with being a loyal member of HMG?

This petition was rejected

Why was this petition rejected?

It’s about something that the UK Government or Parliament is not directly responsible for.

We only reject petitions that don’t meet the petition standards.

Date submitted 17 November 2011
Get petition data (json format)

About petition data

The data shows the number of people who have signed the petition by country as well as in the constituency of each Member of Parliament. This data is available for all petitions on the site. It is not a list of people who have signed the petition. The only name that is shared on the site is that of the petition creator.