Rejected petition Irrelevant uses of tax payers money.

More details

I am going to disscus the use of tax payers money. Im sure in the news we've all heard about the £22,000 of tax payers money spent in portraits of a speaker and also the frame costed around 15K. But im sorry i am not going to be paying tax for expensive portraits of MPs when the money could go funding houses, education and health care, i will not sit down and watch irrelevant painting being painted with our money that we pay from hard earned work!. I mean it got nothing to do with running the country i mean looking a invaluable painting of a random person will not rise the economy.

This petition was rejected

Why was this petition rejected?

It’s not clear what the petition is asking the UK Government or Parliament to do.

We only reject petitions that don’t meet the petition standards.

Date submitted 6 December 2011
Get petition data (json format)

About petition data

The data shows the number of people who have signed the petition by country as well as in the constituency of each Member of Parliament. This data is available for all petitions on the site. It is not a list of people who have signed the petition. The only name that is shared on the site is that of the petition creator.