Rejected petition The 2016 advisory deemed unlawful referendum is not a mandate for UK to leave EU

It can't be a mandate if unlawful, with the close result, interference by thrird parties in campaigns, overspending on leave eu and Aaron Banks. Ongoing police and legal investigations, must deem the result totally unsafe and void.

More details

On the 21st February 2019, the Court of Appeal sat down to hear the case of [Sue] Wilson and others versus the Prime Minister.
Lord Justices Hickinbottom and Haddon-Cave presided over a tortuous series of opening statements before suddenly being presented with a surprise from James Eadie QC, representing Theresa May.
Without challenge, Eadie CONCEDED that the referendum had met the threshold for ILLEGALITY. Furthermore, had the referendum been binding, which it was not, on both the government and parliament, it would have a statutory, legal mechanism by which it would be ANNULLED.

This petition was rejected

Why was this petition rejected?

It’s not clear what the petition is asking the UK Government or Parliament to do.

We can't accept your petition because we aren't sure what action you would like the UK Government or Parliament to take.

Questions of legality are for the courts which are independent of the Government or Parliament.

You might want to sign this petition instead:

https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/241848

We only reject petitions that don’t meet the petition standards.

Date submitted 8 April 2019
Get petition data (json format)

About petition data

The data shows the number of people who have signed the petition by country as well as in the constituency of each Member of Parliament. This data is available for all petitions on the site. It is not a list of people who have signed the petition. The only name that is shared on the site is that of the petition creator.