UK Parliament home

This petition was submitted during the 2010 to 2015 Parliament

View other petitions from this Parliament

Closed Calls for an open consultation for the introduction Hybrid Damages Based Agreements

Closed on

The Government does not wish to implement hybrid Damages Based Agreements ['DBAs']. This prevents access to justice.

The Judiciary, advocate hybrid DBAs. Lord Dyson is "disappointed" by the Government's stance; given he leads the current review, this highlights significant issues. Lord Justice Jackson, who reviewed the CPR, advocates hybrid DBAs.

Under the Rule of Law and Separation of Powers, the Legislature and Executive cannot ignore the Judiciary's stance. The Judiciary, who arguably have their finger on the pulse, should not be marginalised to suit the political ideology

Failing to consider hybrid DBAs defeats the purpose of DBAs to allow for revolutionary and cost proportionate access to justice.

Confusion concerning DBAs has led to them not being utilised and denies oft marginalised individuals access to the Court system.

The Government is urged to launch a consultation so concerns that "vested interests" are being protected can be laid to rest.

42 signatures

Show on a map

10,000

Petition progress

View all updates for this petition, with the most recent first.

  • Petition closed

  • Petition published

    This petition can now be signed.

    If this petition gets 10,000 signatures, government will respond to it.

    If this petition gets 100,000 signatures, it will be considered for debate in Parliament.

    This petition will stay open until 30 March 2015.