Skip to main content

This petition was submitted during the 2015 to 2017 Parliament

View other petitions from this Parliament

Closed petition Amend the Dangerous Dogs Act to allow for fair, uniform return of seized dogs.

Closed on

Hundreds of dogs are seized every year by authorities as prohibited dogs, many having posed no danger. Once seized they can spend months or years in kennels awaiting trial. This has a detrimental effect on physical and mental welfare while costing the taxpayer approximately £15 per dog per day.

Despite SI138 giving the Chief of Police discretion to return a dog prior to any court hearing, very few are returned once seized. We petition DEFRA to amend this by way of a S.I to allow owners to make an application directly to the court & for the courts to have overall discretion & jurisdiction if the Chief of Police does not allow a dog to return home within two weeks of its seizure. If the application to the court is successful, the costs of making the application be borne by the police.

12,102 signatures


Petition progress

View all updates for this petition, with the most recent first.

  • Petition closed

  • Government responded to this petition

    The Government considers that the police are best placed to decide whether a seized dog can be returned to its owner based on the individual circumstances of the case.

    Read the response in full

    The Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 prohibits the possession of certain types of dog. However, individual dogs within this category can be kept if they are considered by the courts not to be dangerous and certain precautions are followed.

    While the court decides whether an individual dog can be kept, the dog will have invariably been seized by the police. However the police can decide to release the dog pending the decision of the court. To make this decision the police will consider whether it is in the best interests of public safety as well as the likelihood that the dog will be kept in accordance with certain conditions.

    The police are best placed to make this decision within the tight timeframes needed to keep detention minimal. By comparison, the court process would be lengthy as it would be subject to the submission of evidence from prosecution and defence.

    Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs

  • Government will respond to this petition

    This petition got more than 10,000 signatures meaning that government will respond to it.

  • Petition published

    This petition can now be signed.

    If this petition gets 10,000 signatures, government will respond to it.

    If this petition gets 100,000 signatures, it will be considered for debate in Parliament.

    This petition will stay open until 3 September 2016.