Petition Ban developers starting new work until their EWS1 failing buildings are fixed
Property developers who are historically responsible for buildings that have failed their EWS1 certificate and require works, should not be allowed to start work on new developments, until their previous development failings have been rectified, helping to resolve the situation with more speed.
If property developers aren't held responsible for their unsafe historical buildings, how can the public be assured that their new buildings won't also fail these safety checks in the future? By stopping developers starting on new work until failings are fixed, they'll need to divert their workforce, funds and focus to help resolve this building fire safety crisis across their past portfolio, which is currently affecting many thousands of people. The levy put into action today isn't good enough.
This response was given on 26 May 2021
EWS1 is not a Government requirement, nor a safety certificate. We’re introducing a new tax and levy to ensure industry pays its fair share and takes responsibility for building safety defects.
It is important to clarify that the EWS1 process and EWS1 form is not a Government, or regulatory requirement, and it is not a safety certificate. Buildings cannot ‘fail’ an EWS1 assessment. The EWS1 process was created by industry to help understand if a building may need value affecting remediation work. This information is then used by lenders when making mortgage lending decisions.
We know many leaseholders and building owners are being asked for EWS1 forms unnecessarily, especially for lower rise buildings. There is other evidence that can prove a building is safe, which we would encourage lenders to accept for valuations.
In March 2021, the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) published guidance on the use of the EWS1 process. This guidance offers greater clarity and consistency on when an EWS1 should be used, and when it shouldn’t. We estimate that nearly 500,000 homeowners should no longer need an EWS1 to sell their property if the RICS guidance - which is supported by the majority of lenders - is followed.
Where remedial works are required, we are continuing to see an increase in the number of building completing remediation or coming onto site for remediation works thanks to ongoing support and engagement from the Government. In more than half of the cases where there is ACM cladding on private sector residential blocks, the original developer or current building owner has agreed to pay or there has been a warranty in place to cover the costs, therefore protecting leaseholders. 95% of the highest risk buildings with ACM identified at the start of 2020 are now remediated or have work underway.
We have been clear that building owners and industry should make buildings safe without passing on costs to leaseholders. Where they have not stepped up, we have intervened with an unprecedented £5.1 billion investment into building safety to fund the remediation of unsafe cladding for leaseholders in residential buildings over 18 metres. And lower rise buildings between 11 and 18 metres, with a lower risk to safety, will gain new protection from the costs of cladding remediation with a generous finance scheme, through which no leaseholder will have to pay more than £50 per month towards the cost.
With the taxpayer stepping in to protect leaseholders from remediation costs, it is fundamental that the industry that caused this legacy of unsafe buildings is made to contribute for compromising public safety. That is why the five-point plan announced on 10 February 2021 introduces a developer levy at Gateway 2 stage of the new Building Safety Regime. This will target developers seeking permission to build certain high-rise buildings in England. It also includes a new tax which will be brought to bear on the largest housing developers in relation to the money they make from residential properties. We anticipate that the new tax will raise £2 billion over a decade to help pay for cladding remediation costs. We are working to develop these areas and we will be setting out further details of the developer levy in due course.
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
At 100,000 signatures...
At 100,000 signatures, this petition will be considered for debate in Parliament
Other parliamentary business
Petitions Committee requests a revised response from the Government
The Petitions Committee (the group of MPs who oversee the petitions system) have considered the Government’s response to this petition. They felt that the response did not directly address the request of petition and have therefore written back to the Government to ask them to provide a revised response.
When the Committee have received a revised response from the Government, this will be published on the website and you will receive an email.